Conflict resolution#

We recognize that conflicts can arise in any collaborative environment. Our goal is to resolve conflicts fairly, respectfully, and efficiently while maintaining a positive community atmosphere.

Our Approach#

We believe in addressing conflicts early and directly. Our process is designed to be:

  • Fair: All parties have a chance to be heard

  • Transparent: Process and outcomes are documented (while respecting privacy)

  • Respectful: We focus on issues, not personalities

  • Efficient: We aim to resolve conflicts quickly without unnecessary bureaucracy

Resolution Process#

The following flowchart illustrates the conflict resolution process:

        flowchart TD
    Conflict([Conflict identified]) --> Step1[Step 1: Direct Communication]
    
    Step1 --> Try1{Resolution<br/>attempt?}
    Try1 -->|Success| Resolved([Conflict resolved])
    Try1 -->|Failure| Step2[Step 2: Mediation]
    
    Step2 --> Mediator{Conflict type?}
    Mediator -->|Contributor ↔ Contributor| CM1[Core Maintainer<br/>as mediator]
    Mediator -->|Contributor ↔ Maintainer| OSL1[Open Science Lead<br/>as mediator]
    Mediator -->|Maintainer ↔ Maintainer| OSL2[Open Science Lead<br/>as mediator]
    
    CM1 --> Try2{Resolution?}
    OSL1 --> Try2
    OSL2 --> Try2
    
    Try2 -->|Success| Resolved
    Try2 -->|Failure| Step3[Step 3: Escalation]
    
    Step3 --> Escalate[Escalate to<br/>Open Science Lead or ESA]
    Escalate --> Governance[Review by<br/>Governance Group]
    Governance --> Decision[Final decision]
    Decision --> Resolved
    
    Resolved --> Document[Document conflict<br/>and resolution]
    
    classDef defaultStyle fill:#f5f5f5,stroke:#9e9e9e,stroke-width:2px,color:#333
    class Conflict,Step1,Step2,Step3,Resolved,Try1,Mediator,CM1,OSL1,OSL2,Try2,Escalate,Governance,Decision,Document defaultStyle
    
    style Conflict fill:#ef9a9a,stroke:#e57373,stroke-width:2px
    style Step1 fill:#e1bee7,stroke:#e1bee7,stroke-width:2px
    style Step2 fill:#a3d8b0,stroke:#a3d8b0,stroke-width:2px
    style Step3 fill:#e1bee7,stroke:#e1bee7,stroke-width:2px
    style Resolved fill:#a3d8b0,stroke:#a3d8b0,stroke-width:3px
    style Try1 fill:#f5f5f5,stroke:#9e9e9e,stroke-width:2px
    style Try2 fill:#f5f5f5,stroke:#9e9e9e,stroke-width:2px

Step 1: Direct Communication

Start by trying to resolve the conflict directly with the involved parties. Often, a respectful conversation can clear up misunderstandings.

  • Use private channels (direct messages, email) for sensitive matters

  • Focus on the specific issue, not personal attributes

  • Listen actively and try to understand different perspectives

  • Look for common ground and mutually acceptable solutions

Step 2: Mediation

If direct communication doesn’t resolve the issue, involve a neutral party:

  • For contributor-to-contributor conflicts: Contact a core maintainer

  • For contributor-to-maintainer conflicts: Contact the Open Science Lead

  • For maintainer-to-maintainer conflicts: Contact the Open Science Lead or ESA representative

The mediator will:

  • Listen to all parties

  • Help clarify the issues

  • Facilitate a constructive discussion

  • Work toward a mutually acceptable solution

Step 3: Escalation

For serious conflicts or when mediation doesn’t resolve the issue:

  • Escalate to the Open Science Lead or ESA representative

  • The governance group will review the situation

  • A formal decision will be made and communicated to all parties

  • The resolution will be documented (respecting privacy)

Step 4: Documentation

All conflicts and their resolutions are documented (with appropriate privacy considerations) to:

  • Ensure consistency in how conflicts are handled

  • Learn from past experiences

  • Maintain transparency in the process

Principles#

When resolving conflicts, we follow these principles:

  • Focus on Issues: Address the problem, not the person. Critique ideas, not individuals.

  • Seek Understanding: Try to understand all perspectives before making judgments.

  • Find Common Ground: Look for solutions that work for everyone involved.

  • Respect Decisions: Once a decision is made through the proper process, respect it even if you disagree.

  • Maintain Privacy: Keep sensitive matters private while being transparent about the process.

Escalation Path#

Here’s the typical escalation path for different types of conflicts:

  1. Contributor ↔ Contributor

    • Start with direct discussion

    • If needed, involve a core maintainer as mediator

  2. Contributor ↔ Maintainer

    • Start with direct discussion

    • If needed, involve another core maintainer or Open Science Lead as mediator

  3. Maintainer ↔ Maintainer

    • Start with direct discussion

    • If needed, involve the Open Science Lead as mediator

    • Escalate to ESA if necessary

  4. Governance Issues

    • Discuss in Governance Meetings

    • Final decision by ESA in consultation with governance group

Getting Help#

If you’re unsure how to handle a conflict or need guidance:

  • Review the Code of Conduct for behavioral guidelines

  • Contact a core maintainer or the Open Science Lead

  • Open a private issue or discussion if you prefer anonymity

  • Remember: asking for help is always okay

Previous: First Developer Meeting | Next: Getting help